8 Best Project Risk Register Software for 2026

Why Use Mitti (by SafetyCulture)?

Mitti (by SafetyCulture) is a workplace operations platform built for teams that want project risk tracking to live alongside the inspections, audits and corrective actions already running their day to day work. Project teams can log a risk the moment it surfaces during a site walk or check in, score it, and route it straight into an action plan. Automated workflows trigger notifications, assign owners and schedule follow-up inspections the moment a risk is logged, so nothing sits unaddressed. Real-time dashboards give project managers a single view of risk exposure across every active project rather than one team's spreadsheet. For teams already running inspections in Mitti (by SafetyCulture), a project risk register closes the gap between operational risk and project risk instead of running two disconnected systems.

Features:

• Customizable risk register forms with smart fields and logic-based flows for fast risk identification and scoring

• Automated workflows that trigger notifications, action assignments and follow-up inspections when a risk is logged

• Real-time dashboards with multi-site visibility for consolidated project and portfolio risk oversight

• Role-based access controls so risk data stays visible to the right project stakeholders only

• Audit-ready reporting exported as PDF and digital reports to share risk status with project sponsors

Why Use ProjectManager?

ProjectManager builds risk tracking directly into project scheduling through its RAID log, so risks sit next to the tasks, resources and timelines they affect rather than in a separate document. A built-in risk matrix scores likelihood and impact automatically as risks are logged, and the tool imports schedules straight from Microsoft Project, Excel and Google Docs. It suits project managers who want risk visibility without leaving their existing Gantt chart workflow.

Features:

• L og for tracking risks, issues, assumptions and dependencies alongside project tasks

• Built-in risk matrix for automatic likelihood and impact scoring

• Native import from Microsoft Project, Excel and Google Docs

Why Use nTask?

nTask builds a risk matrix directly into its project and task management workflow, letting teams assign risk owners, define mitigation plans and score risks by likelihood and impact without adding a separate tool. Custom fields let teams tailor the risk module to their own scoring criteria. It's a fit for small project teams that want risk tracking bundled into day to day task management rather than bought separately.

Features:

• Risk matrix with customizable fields for likelihood, impact and mitigation plans

• Risk register linked directly to tasks and issues within each project

• Native iOS and Android apps for updating risks on the go

Why Use Wrike?

Wrike's RAID log template gives project and program managers a shared intake process for new risks, complete with cost, status and risk-score fields calculated automatically as reports come in. Risks can be cross-tagged and shared across multiple projects, so a program-level view of risk exposure builds itself as individual project managers submit reports. It works best for larger teams already using Wrike for cross-functional project delivery.

Features:

• RAID log template with automated risk-score and cost calculations

• Cross-tagging to share risk visibility across multiple projects and teams

• AI-powered insights that flag project risks before they affect delivery

Why Use Celoxis?

Celoxis includes a dedicated risk and benefit analyzer alongside its resource and portfolio management tools, giving project managers a visual read on risk severity and likelihood without switching to a separate risk system. Risks roll up into the same dashboards used for budget and timeline tracking, so sponsors see risk exposure next to cost and schedule health. It suits mid-to-large project management offices running multiple concurrent projects.

Features:

• Risk and benefit analyzer with visual severity and likelihood scoring

• Risk data integrated into the same dashboards as budget and schedule tracking

• Custom apps for tailoring risk workflows to your organization's process

Why Use ClickUp?

ClickUp's risk register templates give project teams a ready-made structure, including custom statuses, risk-scoring fields and multiple views by cost or severity, built on top of ClickUp's existing task and Gantt chart system. Because it's template-based rather than a fixed module, teams can adapt the fields and views to match how their organization actually scores risk. It's a strong fit for teams that already run their projects in ClickUp and want risk tracking without adopting new software.

Features:

• Pre-built risk register templates with customizable statuses and scoring fields

• Multiple views including risk cost, risk level and risk by status

• Automations that notify owners when a risk's likelihood or impact changes

Why Use Intaver?

Intaver is built specifically for quantitative project risk analysis to show how identified risks affect completion dates and cost, not just a qualitative score. Its risk register links directly to individual tasks, so a risk's real schedule impact is calculated rather than estimated by eye. It's aimed at project managers and schedulers who need statistical rigor behind their risk register, not just a log.

Features:

• Monte Carlo simulation for schedule and cost risk analysis tied to the risk register

• Direct integration with Microsoft Project and Oracle Primavera schedules

• Risk-adjusted charts showing optimistic and pessimistic project timelines

Why Use Teamwork.com?

Teamwork.com is built for agencies and client-facing project teams, and its custom fields and task templates let project managers build a risk register that sits inside the same workspace clients already see. It's a good fit for teams managing client project risk where budget impact matters as much as schedule impact.

Features:

• Custom fields for building a risk register inside existing project templates

• Budget and workload data visible alongside flagged project risks

• Client-facing project views so risk status can be shared without a separate report